High Courts Should Not Decide Contractual Disputes Involving Disputed Facts Under Article 226 When Arbitration Remedy Exists: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a 10-year fisheries lease agreement and the forfeiture of a security deposit, ruling that pure contractual disputes involving complex and disputed questions of fact cannot be adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. A division bench comprising Justice Sudhanshu Chauhan

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  Section 163A MV Act | Can Compensation be Awarded For Accident Due to Fall of Big Branch of Tree on Deceased Motorcycle Rider? Karnataka HC Answers
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles