Ration Card can’t be used as Address, Residence Proof: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has recently clarified that ration cards are intended solely for accessing essential commodities under the public distribution system and should not be used as proof of address or residence.

Justice Chandra Dhari Singh noted the lack of a verification mechanism for the address details on ration cards, saying that their purpose is restricted to ensuring the distribution of foodgrains at reasonable prices to citizens.

This ruling came during the court’s hearing of pleas by several inhabitants of Kathputli Colony, who sought alternative housing in exchange for their current makeshift homes.

Play button

Despite the Delhi Development Authority (DDA)’s reliance on ration cards as address proof in the rehabilitation process, the court found this practice misaligned with the central government’s directive and the inherent purpose of ration cards.

READ ALSO  Sandeshkhali: Calcutta HC says no restraint on arrest of Shajahan Sheikh

Referring to a 2015 gazette notification from the Union Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, which specifically cautioned against using ration cards as identity or residence proof, Justice Singh criticised the DDA’s approach as arbitrary.

The court noted that ration cards are designed for food distribution, not as identity or address verification tools.

Also Read

READ ALSO  SC seeks Centre's reply on PIL for decriminalising consensual sex between 16-18 yr olds

The judgement impacts the rehabilitation policy for Kathputli Colony’s jhuggi dwellers, particularly those whose eligibility was previously contested due to the absence of a ration card.

Justice Singh directed the DDA to accept alternative documents listed in the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015, like passports, electricity bills, and driving licences, for verifying residents’ claims to alternative accommodation.

This order mandates the DDA to provide alternative dwelling units to the petitioners, contingent on the presentation of pertinent documents issued before the January 1, 2015, cutoff date. (IANS)

READ ALSO  हाई कोर्ट ने नाबालिग छात्राओं के यौन उत्पीड़न के लिए स्कूल बस चालक को 5 साल की जेल की सजा बरकरार रखी
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles