Clarifying the principles governing territorial jurisdiction under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Supreme Court of India has held that the mere conduct of arbitral proceedings at a location for administrative convenience, or the fact that an arbitrator was appointed by a High Court situated there, does not make that place the juridical seat
High Court’s Physical Seat Or Venue Of Sittings Does Not Determine Juridical Seat Of Arbitration: Supreme Court
