The High Court of Chhattisgarh has ruled that the mere entrustment of an additional charge of the Registrar under the Pharmacy Act, 1948, read with the Pharmacy Council Rules, 1978, pending regular appointment, does not amount to holding a substantive statutory office. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Judge Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Absence of Valid Appointment Fails Quo Warranto Test: Chhattisgarh HC Rules Additional Charge of Pharmacy Registrar Is Not a Substantive Statutory Office
