Defendant Cannot Use Additional Written Statement to Introduce Inconsistent Defence and Bypass Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Supreme Court

In a significant ruling on civil procedure, the Supreme Court of India has held that a defendant cannot be permitted to file an additional written statement at an advanced stage of a trial to introduce a completely inconsistent and contradictory defence, particularly when such an attempt is a “ploy” to bypass the statutory restrictions of

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  Muslim Men Have Divorce Options Under Family Courts Act, Despite Restrictions in Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act: MP High Court
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles