The Delhi High Court has held that a writ court, in exercise of its certiorari jurisdiction, cannot undertake a re-appreciation of facts to determine the legality of a GST corrigendum when an efficacious alternative remedy is available. The Bench, comprising Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Ajay Digpaul, observed that mere disagreement with the findings
Writ Court Cannot Re-Appreciate Facts Regarding Nature Of Corrigendum: Delhi High Court Refuses To Bypass Statutory Remedy In GST Dispute
