The Supreme Court of India has quashed criminal proceedings against the father-in-law, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law of a complainant, observing that “generalized and sweeping accusations” without specific evidence of active involvement cannot form the basis for criminal prosecution in matrimonial disputes. The Bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Augustine George Masih set aside a November
Lack of Specific Allegations: Supreme Court Quashes Cruelty and Bigamy Proceedings Against In-Laws
