The Supreme Court recently voiced concerns about Advocate Mohd. Kamran’s dual professional commitments as both a lawyer and a freelance journalist. During a defamation case filed by Kamran against former BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, the focus shifted to Kamran’s concurrent roles, which the Court criticized as “highly unprofessional.”
Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masiah presided over the hearing, questioning the ethical implications of Kamran’s simultaneous professions. Justice Oka expressed dismay at Kamran’s dual roles, challenging the compatibility of such practices with the ethical standards expected of legal professionals.
“How can a member of the Bar assert that he is working as a freelance journalist as well as a member of the Bar? This is highly unprofessional,” Justice Oka stated. He prompted Kamran’s counsel to confirm whether Kamran intends to continue in both capacities.
The matter has drawn the attention of the Bar Council of India and the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh following an order on July 29, 2024, which required both councils to examine Kamran’s professional conduct. The case is scheduled for a subsequent hearing on November 29, 2024.
Justice Oka emphasized the need for Kamran to choose between his roles as a lawyer and a journalist to avoid any conflict of interest. “He has to make a statement; either he has to be an Advocate or a freelance journalist. He can’t have it both ways,” Justice Oka remarked.
The Supreme Court’s concern centers on the potential conflict of interest and the breach of confidentiality obligations inherent in the legal profession, which may be compromised by the journalistic activities of a practicing lawyer.
