Supreme Court Round-Up for March 28

Important cases heard in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 28:

* SC dismissed jailed former MP and alleged gangster Atiq Ahmad’s plea seeking protection during his custody with the Uttar Pradesh police in the Umesh Pal murder case.

* SC agreed to list for hearing on April 21 a plea of the Hindu side seeking consolidation of all suits filed in a Varanasi court pertaining to the Gyanvapi mosque complex row.

* SC directed the Gujarat government to file its reply on a petition by sacked IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt to submit additional evidence to support his appeal in the Gujarat High Court against his conviction in a 1990 custodial death case.

READ ALSO  Tendering False Undertaking or Affidavit Amounts to Contempt of Court, Rules Supreme Court

* What is the fundamental right that is violated?” SC asked NCP leader Mohammed Faizal who has filed a plea against the Lok Sabha Secretariat for not withdrawing a notification disqualifying him as an MP despite his conviction in an attempt-to-murder case being stayed by the Kerala High Court.

* The Bombay Lawyers Association moved the SC against a high court decision dismissing its PIL against Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju and Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar for their remarks on judiciary and the collegium system for appointment of judges.

* SC said it would hear in the first week of May a PIL seeking to restrain convicted persons from forming political parties and becoming their office-bearers for the period they are disqualified under election laws.

READ ALSO  What Is the Meaning of the Phrase “Substantial Question of Law” in Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure? Explains SC

* SC observed that abjuring hate speech is a fundamental requisite for maintenance of communal harmony in the country.

* A day after a Namibian cheetah died at the Kuno National Park in Madhya Pradesh, the SC sought details of experts in the Cheetah Task Force such as their qualification and experience.

* SC dismissed an appeal filed the customs department against Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (APML), Adani Power Rajasthan Limited (APRL) and others in a case pertaining to alleged over-valuation of imported goods.

READ ALSO  Man’s Responsibility Towards First Wife Not Extinguished by Second Marriage: Karnataka HC
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Related Articles

Latest Articles