In this case, the High Court of Orissa dismissed the petition, in which the petitioner challenges an order in September 2022, passed in CT (SPL.) POCSO2020 by the learned Adhoc Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTSC), Jajpur, on the grounds that the procedure specified in Section 329 Cr.P.C. was erroneously adopted, and the same is
Sec 329 CrPC: Physical Presence of Accused Necessary To Determine Plea of Unsoundness, Rules Orissa HC
