• About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us
Friday, January 15, 2021
Law Trend
  • google-play
  • apple-store
  • Login
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
No Result
View All Result

SC Refuses to Interfere in Plea of Republic TV and Arnab Goswami Challenging FIR

Law Trend by Law Trend
November 9, 2020
in Court Updates, Trending Stories
2 min read
272 17
0
republic tv arnab
562
SHARES
1.6k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via WhatsappShare via EmailPinterest

Today the Supreme Court refused to interfere in the Plea of Republic TV and its Editor-in-Chief Mr Arnab Goswami, seeking quashing of FIR in connection with Manipulation of TRP.

Supreme Court has allowed the Republic TV and Mr Arnab Goswami to approach Bombay High Court.

Supreme Court observed that it would be better if you approach the Bombay High Court Either under 482 Cr.P.C. or Article 226 of Constitution.

Justice Chandrachud also observed that the court is concerned that there is a growing tendency of Commissioner of Police giving interviews.

Justice Indu Malhotra observed that the Petitioner Channel and Arnab Goswami could go to High Court under Article 226 of Constitution, as it is more expansive than Article 32.

Last week the Commissioner of Police held a Press Conference and claimed to have busted a racket of Fake TRP by television channels. Read Here

Advertisements

As per the statement of Mumbai Police, people were paid Rs. 400-500 per month to switch on channels for 24 hours continuously. The households where members were illiterate, were watching English News Channels.

Mumbai Police revealed the name of Republic TV, Fakth Marati and Box Cinema, who are alleged to be involved in this practice.

As per Mumbai Police, these manipulations are done to get higher TRPs and obtain Advertisements. The Police has caught a person who is alleged to be associated with Hansa Research Group Pvt Ltd, which was assisting the Broadcast Audience Research Council.

Mumbai Police has lodged FIR for offences of criminal breach of trust (Section 409), cheating (420) and criminal conspiracy (120B) under the Indian Penal Code.

Republic TV Editor-In-Chief Arnab Goswami had issued a statement warning Mumbai Police of the criminal defamation case.

Tags: firlatest Court Newsmumbai policerepublic tvSupreme Courttrend2

Related Posts

Arnab Goswami BARC HEad Das gupta
Trending Stories

Big: WhatsApp Chats Between Arnab Goswami and Ex-BARC Head Released by Prashant Bhushan

January 15, 2021
calcutta high court
Judgements

Same Gender harassment complaint maintainable under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act

January 15, 2021
whatsapp
Court Updates

New Privacy Policy of Whatsapp challenged in the Delhi High Court- Justice Pratibha Singh Recuses

January 15, 2021
Chhattisgarh HC
Trending Stories

बीजेपी अध्यक्ष जेपी नड्डा खिलाफ सुनवाई से हाई कोर्ट का इनकार

January 15, 2021
alcohal
Court Updates

To attract an offence of drunk driving, accused should be subjected to blood test or breath analyser test

January 15, 2021
BCI Bar Council of India
Court Updates

Appreciate Supreme Court Order on Farm Laws: BCI Chairman

January 15, 2021

POPULAR NEWS

  • advocate sticker fortuner

    Where is the Provision of Using Advocate Sticker on Vehicle?

    5006 shares
    Share 2002 Tweet 1252
  • What is the tenure of protection granted under Anticipatory Bail? :SC 5 Judges

    4798 shares
    Share 1918 Tweet 1199
  • Air Asia Crashes Against Gaurav Taneja; Court Says Airline Suppressed Facts

    4619 shares
    Share 1848 Tweet 1155
  • Husband-Wife Take Oath as High Court Judge

    3242 shares
    Share 1297 Tweet 811
  • Is Using Stickers of ‘‘Advocate’’ on Vehicle legally Allowed?

    3162 shares
    Share 1265 Tweet 791
Law Trend

Rabhyaa Foundation has started this platform on values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. The object of this platform is to create informed citizens with recent legal updates, Judgments, Legislations of Parliament and State Legislatures, and views of experts in the field of law, in plain and pointed language, for the intellectual development of citizens.
Our tag line “The Line of Law” guides that this......
Read More

Follow Us On Social Media

Subscribe to our News Letter

Sign Up for weekly newsletter to get the latest news, Updates and amazing offers delivered directly in to your inbox.

Categories

  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Columns
  • Bare Acts and Rules
  • Online Internship
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend – हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
      • Uttar Pradesh Acts
      • Uttar Pradesh Rules
      • Uttrakhand
      • DELHI
  • Webinar/Videos
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
  • Android App
  • IOS APP

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In