The Supreme Court of India has set aside the murder conviction of two appellants, ruling that serious discrepancies in eyewitness testimonies, medical contradictions, and grave investigative lapses created a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. A Bench comprising Justice J. B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran allowed the criminal appeal against the judgment of the High
Ring of Falsity in Related Eyewitness Testimonies and Investigative Lapses Warrant Benefit of Doubt: Supreme Court
