Mere Living in a Particular House by Itself Would Not Mean That the Said House Is Under Ownership of the Person Living Therein: SC

ruled that mere living in a particular house by itself would not mean that the said house is under ownership of the person living therein. The bench of Justices Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal was dealing with the appeal challenging the order passed by the Single Judge of the High Court. In this case,

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  Anticipatory Bail Application Not Maintainable After Cancellation of Regular bail: SC
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Related Articles

Latest Articles