High Courts Should Not Interfere with Arbitrator’s Section 16 Stamping Decisions Under Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India has held that High Courts exercising extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution should not interdict ongoing arbitral proceedings by entertaining challenges to an arbitrator’s order rejecting an objection under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, except in cases of patent lack of

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  S. 53 NDPS Act | Any confessional statement made to Police Office would be barred under the provisions of Section 25 of the Evidence Act: SC
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles