Disobedience of HC Order: Supreme Court Directs Andhra Pradesh Govt to Demote Deputy Collector to Tehsildar

 In a stern message underscoring the supremacy of judicial authority, the Supreme Court on Friday directed the Andhra Pradesh government to demote a deputy collector to the post of tehsildar for willfully disobeying a 2013 high court order and forcibly removing hutments in Guntur district in January 2014.

A bench comprising Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih held that the officer, who was promoted to deputy collector in 2023, had committed โ€œdeliberate and utter disobedienceโ€ of the high courtโ€™s direction which had explicitly restrained eviction of hutments.

โ€œDisobedience of the orders passed by the court attacks the very foundation of the rule of law on which our democracy is based,โ€ the bench observed, adding, โ€œEvery authority, howsoever high, is bound to respect and comply with the courtโ€™s orders.โ€

READ ALSO  Supreme Court Asks Centre to Clarify Judicial Compensation Scope and Regulator Selection Under SHANTI Act

While the Supreme Court confirmed the high courtโ€™s finding of contempt, it modified the sentence of two months’ imprisonment imposed earlier. Instead, it ordered the officerโ€™s demotion and imposed a fine of โ‚น1 lakh. โ€œThough we take a lenient view, a message requires to be given that no one, howsoever high he may be, is above the law,โ€ the bench emphasized.

The contempt proceedings originated from a plea against the officerโ€”who was then a tehsildarโ€”alleging he forcibly demolished hutments in violation of a December 11, 2013 high court directive.

The apex court, during earlier proceedings, had asked the officer if he was willing to accept a demotion. On Friday, his counsel submitted that the officer โ€œwill go down to any punishment.โ€

Dismissing the officerโ€™s appeal, the Supreme Court concluded that allowing such defiance would erode the judicial system. Justice Gavai stated, โ€œWe want the message to go throughout the country that nobody would tolerate disobedience of the courtโ€™s order.โ€

READ ALSO  CJI เค•เฅ‡ เค…เคจเฅเคฐเฅ‹เคง เคชเคฐ เคธเฅเคชเฅเคฐเฅ€เคฎ เค•เฅ‹เคฐเฅเคŸ เคจเฅ‡ เค‡เคฒเคพเคนเคพเคฌเคพเคฆ เคนเคพเคˆเค•เฅ‹เคฐเฅเคŸ เค•เฅ‡ เคœเคœ เค•เฅ‡ เค–เคฟเคฒเคพเคซ เค•เฅ€ เค—เคˆ เคŸเคฟเคชเฅเคชเคฃเคฟเคฏเคพเค‚ เคนเคŸเคพเคˆเค‚, เคฎเคพเคฎเคฒเคพ เคนเคพเคˆเค•เฅ‹เคฐเฅเคŸ เค•เฅ‡ เคฎเฅเค–เฅเคฏ เคจเฅเคฏเคพเคฏเคพเคงเฅ€เคถ เคชเคฐ เค›เฅ‹เคกเคผเคพ

The Andhra Pradesh government has now been directed to implement the demotion and recover the imposed fine.

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles