In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has declared that courts have the authority to estimate the income of spouses when determining maintenance payments, recognizing the practical difficulties in obtaining accurate income records. The decision emerged from a case where the income of both parties is often undisclosed or underreported.
Justice Surendra Singh, presiding over the case of Shaili Mittal and two others, partially accepted a review petition that challenged a previous ruling by the Muzaffarnagar family court. The family court had ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance of โน7,000 to his wife and โน2,000 to each of their two children. However, the High Court has revised these figures upwards after estimating the husband’s monthly income at โน60,000. Accordingly, the wife will now receive โน15,000 per month, and each child will receive โน6,000.
The High Court emphasized the necessity of this estimation approach due to the common tendency among spouses to conceal their actual earnings. The decision mandates that the revised maintenance payments should commence from the date the original petition was filed and be paid by the 7th of each month.
Also Read
The case reached the High Court after the wife appealed the family courtโs decision, arguing that it had underestimated her husbandโs income. She claimed he had multiple sources of income, whereas he maintained that he was merely a salesman in his brother’s business, earning a monthly salary of โน7,000 to โน8,000. Despite his claims of already providing substantial financial support for his children’s education and interim maintenance for his wife, the High Court found in favor of revising the maintenance payments to better reflect the husband’s estimated income.
