In a significant ruling on juvenile law and circumstantial evidence, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi, held that a subsequent declaration of juvenility does not automatically erase or annul a finding of guilt recorded on evidence, though it renders the adult sentence legally ineffective. The apex court
Conviction Need Not Be Set Aside Merely Because Accused Is Subsequently Found Juvenile; Adult Sentence Cannot Survive: Supreme Court
