The Supreme Court of India, comprising a Bench of Justice J. B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, has held that the appointment of an arbitral tribunal without proven consent from the opposite party—and in the face of objections alleging bias—renders the entire initiation of arbitration non est in law. Setting aside an order of
Arbitral Tribunal’s Appointment Without Proven Consent, Despite Objection Alleging Bias, Is Non Est in Law: Supreme Court
