• About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us
Saturday, January 16, 2021
Law Trend
  • google-play
  • apple-store
  • Login
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
No Result
View All Result

Allahabad High Court Rebukes Lawyer for Bench Hunting [READ ORDER]

Law Trend by Law Trend
August 31, 2020
in Trending Stories
2 min read
260 6
0
allahabad high court
517
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via WhatsappShare via EmailPinterest

On 28 August, Justice Vivek Agarwal of Allahabad High Court, while hearing a Writ Petition bearing no. 1260 of 2020 (Amit Kumar vs State of U.P. and Others) came down heavily on the Petitioner for “failing to point out any infringement of his fundamental rights’’

The Writ Petition was filed seeking following reliefs:

  1.  A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent no.2 to decide the application dated 07.07.2020 which has been given by the petitioner and other co-villagers, which is pending before him (Annexure-3 to this writ petition)
  2.  A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to stop the construction of the Barat Ghar situated in village Manak Chauk, Post Nanpur, District-Hapur.
  3.  Any other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case. IV- 
  4. Award the cost of petition to the petitioner.

The Court asked ther Petitioner to show cause why he has approached the High Court so soon when his application was filed only on 07.07.2020 before the respondent no.2 i.e. District Magistrate, Hapur. To this query the Petitioner submitted that he has filed an application under Right to Information Act (RTI) and a direction be issued to the authorities to decide the application expeditiously.

Advertisements

The Court further asked the Counsel of the petitioner to show as to which of his Fundamental Right has been infringed and what is the locus of the Petitioner, on which the Counsel for the Petitioner sought adjournment.

The Court dismissed the Petition with the following observation:

“This kind of practice of Bench hunting seeking time when confronted with queries is not a healthy practice for the Bar.”

READ ORDER

Tags: Allahabad High Courtlawyerrebuketrend2

Related Posts

Arnab Goswami BARC HEad Das gupta
Trending Stories

Big: WhatsApp Chats Between Arnab Goswami and Ex-BARC Head Released by Prashant Bhushan

January 15, 2021
calcutta high court
Judgements

Same Gender harassment complaint maintainable under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act

January 15, 2021
whatsapp
Court Updates

New Privacy Policy of Whatsapp challenged in the Delhi High Court- Justice Pratibha Singh Recuses

January 15, 2021
Chhattisgarh HC
Trending Stories

बीजेपी अध्यक्ष जेपी नड्डा खिलाफ सुनवाई से हाई कोर्ट का इनकार

January 15, 2021
alcohal
Court Updates

To attract an offence of drunk driving, accused should be subjected to blood test or breath analyser test

January 15, 2021
BCI Bar Council of India
Court Updates

Appreciate Supreme Court Order on Farm Laws: BCI Chairman

January 15, 2021

POPULAR NEWS

  • advocate sticker fortuner

    Where is the Provision of Using Advocate Sticker on Vehicle?

    5006 shares
    Share 2002 Tweet 1252
  • What is the tenure of protection granted under Anticipatory Bail? :SC 5 Judges

    4799 shares
    Share 1919 Tweet 1199
  • Air Asia Crashes Against Gaurav Taneja; Court Says Airline Suppressed Facts

    4619 shares
    Share 1848 Tweet 1155
  • Husband-Wife Take Oath as High Court Judge

    3242 shares
    Share 1297 Tweet 811
  • Is Using Stickers of ‘‘Advocate’’ on Vehicle legally Allowed?

    3162 shares
    Share 1265 Tweet 791
Law Trend

Rabhyaa Foundation has started this platform on values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. The object of this platform is to create informed citizens with recent legal updates, Judgments, Legislations of Parliament and State Legislatures, and views of experts in the field of law, in plain and pointed language, for the intellectual development of citizens.
Our tag line “The Line of Law” guides that this......
Read More

Follow Us On Social Media

Subscribe to our News Letter

Sign Up for weekly newsletter to get the latest news, Updates and amazing offers delivered directly in to your inbox.

Categories

  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Columns
  • Bare Acts and Rules
  • Online Internship
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend – हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
      • Uttar Pradesh Acts
      • Uttar Pradesh Rules
      • Uttrakhand
      • DELHI
  • Webinar/Videos
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
  • Android App
  • IOS APP

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In