Contempt Jurisdiction is discretionary, should be used sparingly, Rules Supreme Court

Recently, the Supreme Court noted that contempt jurisdiction is always discretionary and should be exercised sparingly.  Observing thus, the Bench ruled that Sir Sri Maa Kamakhya Temple Management matter is not a fit case to exercise jurisdiction by punishing Kamakhya Debutter Board members or to direct the Board to return the money they allegedly misappropriated.

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  Power Company Files Caveat in HC Apprehending Litigation Against 2 Proposed Coal Power Units in Nagpur
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles