Supreme Court Retains Hanging As Execution Method While Leaving Room For Future Review

The Supreme Court has declined to re-examine the constitutional validity of execution by hanging, upholding a decades-old legal precedent while noting that the central government remains free to evaluate alternative execution methods that minimize prisoner suffering.

A bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta on Tuesday rejected a plea seeking to refer a 1983 three-judge bench decision—which originally affirmed hanging as constitutional—to a larger panel. The court stated that no sufficient case had been made to reconsider the statutory provisions governing death by hanging under Section 354 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 393(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Door Left Open For Scientific Scrutiny

Despite refusing the reference, the judges explicitly clarified that their ruling does not permanently block future legal challenges. The bench noted that constitutional interpretation is an organic process that must adapt to evolving legal principles and modern scientific knowledge.

Future constitutional scrutiny remains possible should compelling empirical, medical, or scientific evidence emerge showing that the factual basis underlying the 1983 judgment has been rendered outdated by new developments.

READ ALSO  Supreme Court Slaps Fine of Rs 5 Lakh on Lawyer Challenging Collegium Recommendation

Government Free To Form Expert Panel

The court highlighted that nothing in its decision prevents the Union government from conducting a comprehensive review of current execution methods.

It noted that the government could establish an expert advisory body featuring specialists across neuroscience, forensic medicine, criminology, law, and related fields. Such a panel could study whether alternative modes of execution might better fulfill the constitutional mandate of reducing unnecessary pain while maintaining human dignity.

Petitioner Challenged Method As Barbaric

READ ALSO  सुप्रीम कोर्ट काला जादू और अवैध धर्म परिवर्तन पर अगले सप्ताह में कर सकता है सुनवाई

The legal challenge was filed by advocate Rishi Malhotra, who argued that execution by hanging is a cruel, barbaric, and inhuman procedure that violates international resolutions.

Comparing execution methods, Malhotra stated that death by intravenous lethal injection takes no longer than five minutes, whereas execution by hanging requires at least 40 minutes to complete.

Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner
READ ALSO  Bombay HC Refuses To Grant Urgent Hearing To Former CEO Of ICICI Bank Chanda Kochhar and Husband Challenging Their Arrest

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles