Mismatch Between Ocular Testimony And Medical Evidence Entitles Accused To Benefit Of Doubt: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal Of 20 Persons

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Augustine George Masih has upheld the acquittal of 20 individuals in a 2014 murder case, holding that identical and stereotyped witness testimony indicates tutoring rather than truthful recollection, and that significant contradictions between ocular versions and medical evidence create reasonable doubt. Dismissing appeals filed by

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now