In a significant move to ensure the survival and healthy growth of urban greenery, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has directed the Forest Department and urban local bodies in Dehradun to take immediate action against the widespread concretisation of tree trunks. The tribunal has mandated that authorities address grievances regarding impermeable materials surrounding trees within a four-week window.
The Principal Bench, comprising Chairperson Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Expert Member A. Senthil Vel, was hearing an application that raised serious concerns over the violation of established tree-protection norms in Uttarakhand’s capital. The plea highlighted the use of non-pervious tiles and other impermeable materials around trees, which prevents water from reaching the roots and stifles growth.
The matter reached the tribunal through an application supported by photographic evidence and geo-coordinates, documenting the extent of concretisation in Dehradun. The applicant’s counsel informed the bench that similar grievances had been raised previously. On May 8, 2025, earlier applications were withdrawn after the applicant was directed to approach the relevant authorities directly.
Despite submitting a formal representation to several authorities on May 28, 2025, the applicant claimed that no remedial action was taken, prompting the current intervention by the green body.
Taking note of the lack of progress, the NGT reiterated the legal standards set in the landmark case of Aditya N. Prasad Vs Union of India. That judgment specifically mandated the removal of concrete within at least a one-metre radius of tree trunks to facilitate their survival.
The tribunal further supported its stance by citing two additional judgments from its Principal Bench, which consistently directed authorities to act in accordance with these environmental protection orders.
While disposing of the application, the NGT provided a clear roadmap for enforcement:
- Fresh Representation: The applicant is permitted to file a fresh representation to the Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) and the head of the concerned urban local body.
- Evidence-Based Action: This representation must be accompanied by supporting photographs showing the current status of the trees.
- Strict Timeline: Upon receipt, the authorities must ascertain the status of the trees and take “appropriate action” within four weeks.
- Accountability: The DFO and the urban local body head are required to document their actions in an “action-taken report,” which must be submitted to the Registrar General.
The bench emphasized that any failure to comply with these directions may lead to further consideration of the matter by the tribunal.
