The High Court of Delhi has ruled that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) is not maintainable when an efficacious alternative statutory remedy exists. The Division Bench comprising Justice Anil Kshetarpal and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar dismissed
To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.