• About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us
Friday, March 5, 2021
Law Trend
  • google-play
  • apple-store
  • Login
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
No Result
View All Result

Zero tolerance towards lawyers who spoil the image of Legal Profession: Madras HC

by Law Trend
February 9, 2021
in Trending Stories
2 min read
Advocate Gown and Band
775
SHARES
2.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via WhatsappShare via EmailPinterest

On Monday, the High Court of Madras stated that there would be zero tolerance towards lawyers who indulge in activities that will spoil the legal profession’s image. This observation was made when the Court was dealing with a case where it was alleged that some lawyers were involved in land grabbing.

The petitioner approached the High Court after police showed reluctance to act against the delinquent lawyers.

Hon’ble Court observed that even though such activities were prevalent in the past, the Court bought the situation under control by suspending the found guilty lawyers.

However, the Bench remarked that this land grabbing practice had begun again during the Covid lockdown period.

When the Court noticed some photographs in the record showing lawyers’ participation in such activities, the Court remarked that they would come down heavily on the erring lawyers before the situation got out of hand.

The Court directed the case to the Bar Council for further action and ordered the authority to protect the petitioner’s property.

Lastly, the Court asked the authority to analyse the videos and photographs of the incident and submit the list of advocates who had gathered at the disputed property. 

The Bench stated that this report would form the basis of the complaint that will be forwarded to Bar Council of Tamil Nady and Puducherry. The Court posted the matter for further orders on March 2.

Also Read

  • Right to Advertisement- Why not to Lawyers?
  • Can a Lawyer Use His Home For Office/Chamber Purpose?
  • Unlock 5: MHA Allows Opening Of Multiplexes With 50% Seating Capacity From October 15
  • Can Writ Petition be Maintained Against Private Financial Institutions like HDFC? Allahabad HC
  • High Court Grants Bail to Maulana, Accused of Connection with Al-Qaeda

Background:

In the instant case, the petitioner filed a complaint about offences under section 419,420,467,468,120B and 109 of IPC., the accused was arrested after the Court dismissed his anticipatory bail application.

However, the prosecution alleged that the accused still instigated people, including the group that tried to grab the land.

,

Tags: lawyermadras high courttrend2

Related Posts

supreme court 2021 2
Judgements

Can Non-explanation or False Explanation by Accused U/s 313 CrpC be used to complete chain of Circumstances? SC

March 4, 2021
ncdrc
Court Updates

Can Consumer Court Entertain Complaint After Adjudication of Dispute in Arbitration? NCDRC

March 4, 2021
Supreme Court 2021
Trending Stories

We Should Send a Message to the Bar that the Apex Court Will Not Adjourn the Matter for Nothing: SC

March 4, 2021

Advertisement

POPULAR NEWS

  • Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala lawtrend

    Bombay HC Judge who gave “Skin to Skin” POCSO Verdict loses Judgeship Confirmation

    5733 shares
    Share 2293 Tweet 1433
  • Where is the Provision of Using Advocate Sticker on Vehicle?

    5118 shares
    Share 2047 Tweet 1280
  • What is the tenure of protection granted under Anticipatory Bail? :SC 5 Judges

    4830 shares
    Share 1931 Tweet 1207
  • Air Asia Crashes Against Gaurav Taneja; Court Says Airline Suppressed Facts

    4702 shares
    Share 1881 Tweet 1176
  • Husband-Wife Take Oath as High Court Judge

    3271 shares
    Share 1308 Tweet 818
Law Trend

Rabhyaa Foundation has started this platform on values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. The object of this platform is to create informed citizens with recent legal updates, Judgments, Legislations of Parliament and State Legislatures, and views of experts in the field of law, in plain and pointed language, for the intellectual development of citizens.
Our tag line “The Line of Law” guides that this......
Read More

Follow Us On Social Media

Subscribe to our News Letter

Sign Up for weekly newsletter to get the latest news, Updates and amazing offers delivered directly in to your inbox.

Categories

  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Columns
  • Bare Acts and Rules
  • Online Internship
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend – हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
      • Uttar Pradesh Acts
      • Uttar Pradesh Rules
      • Uttrakhand
      • DELHI
  • Webinar/Videos
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
  • Android App
  • IOS APP

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In