You Cannot Argue in ‘Kurta-Pajama’ or ‘Shorts’ and ‘T-Shirt’: SC Rejects PIL for Exemption from Wearing Black Coat and Gown

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking an exemption for lawyers from wearing black coats and gowns in courts during the summer months. The bench, led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, emphasized that a dress code is necessary to maintain decorum in the court.

“Ultimately, it is a matter of decorum. You should be properly attired. You have to wear something. You cannot argue in ‘kurta-pajama’ or shorts and T-shirt also,” the bench remarked.

READ ALSO  Whether Section 52 TP Act Bars Temporary Injunction Against Alienation of Suit Property? Answers AP HC
VIP Membership

The PIL was filed by lawyer Shailendra Mani Tripathi in his personal capacity, seeking relaxation from the mandatory black coat and gown attire during the summer. The court, however, permitted Tripathi to submit a representation to the Bar Council of India, state bar councils, and the Centre, allowing them to make a decision on the matter.

During the hearing, Tripathi argued that lawyers should be exempted from wearing coats and gowns in summer due to varying climatic conditions across India. Chief Justice Chandrachud responded that the climate in Rajasthan differs significantly from Bangalore, and hence, such decisions should be left to the respective bar councils.

The bench reiterated that Tripathi could make a formal representation to the relevant authorities for suitable amendments to the dress code. As the court was not inclined to entertain the PIL, Tripathi sought permission to withdraw it, which was granted.

READ ALSO  सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बॉम्बे हाई कोर्ट एनेक्सी के पुनर्विकास पर चर्चा के लिए बैठक का निर्देश दिया
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles