The Supreme Court of India has taken a firm stance against the ongoing pollution issues in the Palar River, Tamil Nadu, by directing the state to compensate those affected by the environmental damage caused by local tanneries. Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, presiding over the case, outlined significant measures including the establishment of a judicial panel and strict enforcement of environmental laws.
In the landmark ruling, the court identified irreversible ecological damage inflicted by tanneries discharging untreated or inadequately treated effluents into the river and surrounding areas. The pollution has detrimentally impacted water bodies, groundwater, and agricultural lands, leading to substantial human and environmental suffering.
The court’s directives came in response to the lead petition, Vellore District Environment Monitoring Committee v. State of Tamil Nadu, where it was decided that the affected families and individuals must receive compensation based on previous awards dated March 7, 2001, and August 24, 2009. The state is expected to fulfill these compensations within six weeks and recover the costs from the responsible industries under the “Polluter Pays” principle.
Further, the Supreme Court has ordered the formation of a committee, within four weeks, headed by a retired high court judge. This committee will include members such as secretaries of state and Central departments, environmental experts, representatives of the affected communities, and others deemed fit to conduct an extensive environmental audit in Vellore. The objective is to ensure the reversal of damage and maintain a clean, healthy environment.
Justice Mahadevan highlighted the adverse effects of the pollution on local farmers, residents, and tannery workers, stressing the clear danger to public health and life. Despite the establishment of a central effluent treatment plant, the industries involved have failed to meet zero discharge levels and comply with environmental guidelines.
The bench has instituted a “continuing mandamus,” indicating that the court will periodically review compliance with its orders. A compliance report is demanded within four months, with the justices warning of stringent consequences, including imprisonment, for any breaches of the conditions set forth.
The stern warning from the bench—”If any of these conditions are breached, we will send them to Tihar (jail). Not even any jail in Tamil Nadu”—underscores the court’s commitment to enforcing its directives and addressing the pollution crisis rigorously. A detailed judgment on the matter is expected soon, as stakeholders and the public eagerly await further developments.
