Supreme Court Halts Madras HC Order for Inquiry Into FIR Leak in Anna University Assault Case

In a significant judicial turn, the Supreme Court on Monday put a pause on the Madras High Court’s directives involving a departmental inquiry over the leak of a First Information Report (FIR) in a sexual assault case linked to Chennai’s Anna University. The decision came from a bench comprising Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma, who also stayed certain critical remarks made by the high court concerning the Tamil Nadu state police.

The controversy centers on a disturbing incident at Anna University, where a female student was allegedly sexually assaulted, sparking considerable backlash from opposition parties and civil society groups. The leaked FIR, detailing the victim’s information, further compounded the trauma for the victim and her family, leading to the Madras High Court’s stern response in late December 2024.

READ ALSO  362 CrPC: When an Application Seeking Recall of Order is Maintainable? Explains Supreme Court

According to the high court’s earlier order, the Tamil Nadu government was tasked with forming a Special Investigation Team (SIT) of three women IPS officers to thoroughly investigate the assault. Furthermore, the court ordered the state to compensate the victim with Rs 25,00,000 immediately, citing police lapses that facilitated the FIR leak and the resulting distress experienced by the victim and her family.

Play button

Additionally, the high court mandated the initiation of departmental disciplinary proceedings against those within the police department deemed responsible for the oversight.

READ ALSO  जहांगीरपुरी में बुलडोज़र पर जारी रहेगा स्टेः पूरे देश में बुलडोज़र से कार्यवाही पर रोक लगाने से सुप्रीम कोर्ट का इनकार

However, the state government contested these orders at the Supreme Court, arguing that the FIR leak was the result of a technical glitch in the “citizen portal,” a fact acknowledged by the National Informatics Centre through an email. The government’s plea highlighted that corrective measures were swiftly taken: the compromised FIR was blocked, and a subsequent FIR was filed against individuals who disseminated the victim’s details across television and social media.

READ ALSO  Homicidal Death Cannot be Termed as Unnatural Homicide: Bombay HC
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles