• About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us
Wednesday, March 3, 2021
Law Trend
  • google-play
  • apple-store
  • Login
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
No Result
View All Result

SC Dismisses Review Petitions Challenging AADHAR Verdict, Justice DY Chandrachud Dissents

by Law Trend
January 21, 2021
in Trending Stories
2 min read
AADHAR LOGO
616
SHARES
1.8k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via WhatsappShare via EmailPinterest

By a 4:1 majority, the Supreme Court dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the Constitutional Bench decision in AAdhar case( Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5J.) vs Union of India).

Out of all the Bench judges, Hon’ble Justice DY Chandrachud was the only one who expressed his dissent.

The Majority Bench observed that change in law or a larger Bench’s subsequent judgment could not be considered a ground for review. 

On the other hand, Hon’ble Justice Chandrachud opined that the petitions should be kept pending until a larger Bench answers the questions/issues raised in Rojer Mathew.

Developments in the case( Aadhar Judgement)

Hon’ble Justice AK Sikri authored the majority judgement in the case, wherein the Court read down some provisions of Aadhar Act, struck down some sections( 33(2), 47 and 57) and upheld other sections.

However, justice Chadrachud stated that the entire Aadhar project was unconstitutional.

Another Constitution Bench headed by former CJI Ranjan Gogoi examined the validity of some provisions of the Finance Act 2017, which affected tribunals. The Bench questioned the correctness of the Bench majority view, according to which Aadhar Bill was a Money Bill within the meaning of Article 110(1) of Constitution.

In that case (Rojer Mathew vs South India bank), the Bench also observed that the Bench did not discuss the effect of the word only in Article 110(1) and also did not dwell upon the fact that some provisions of the Act did not conform to Article 110(1) to (g).

Therefore, the Bench referred the case to a larger Bench.

Case Details: 

Title: Beghar Foundation vs Justice KS Puttaswamy(Retd.)

Case No.:Review Petition (Civil) Diary No. 45777 of 2018

Date of Order: 11.01.2021

READ/DOWNLOAD JUDGMENT

Tags: aadharSupreme Courtsupreme Court Judgment

Related Posts

bar head partho das gupta
Court Updates

Bombay HC grants bail to former CEO of BARC Partho Dasgupta in the TRP manipulation case

March 2, 2021
hcba lawyers strike
Court Updates

HCBA Terminates Membership of a Lawyer, Who filed Case During Strike

March 2, 2021
Karnataka HC
Court Updates

72 Year Old Accuses 28 High Court Judges as Criminals: HC Directs him to take legal advice

March 2, 2021

Advertisement

POPULAR NEWS

  • Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala lawtrend

    Bombay HC Judge who gave “Skin to Skin” POCSO Verdict loses Judgeship Confirmation

    5725 shares
    Share 2290 Tweet 1431
  • Where is the Provision of Using Advocate Sticker on Vehicle?

    5118 shares
    Share 2047 Tweet 1280
  • What is the tenure of protection granted under Anticipatory Bail? :SC 5 Judges

    4827 shares
    Share 1930 Tweet 1206
  • Air Asia Crashes Against Gaurav Taneja; Court Says Airline Suppressed Facts

    4698 shares
    Share 1879 Tweet 1175
  • Husband-Wife Take Oath as High Court Judge

    3270 shares
    Share 1308 Tweet 818
Law Trend

Rabhyaa Foundation has started this platform on values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. The object of this platform is to create informed citizens with recent legal updates, Judgments, Legislations of Parliament and State Legislatures, and views of experts in the field of law, in plain and pointed language, for the intellectual development of citizens.
Our tag line “The Line of Law” guides that this......
Read More

Follow Us On Social Media

Subscribe to our News Letter

Sign Up for weekly newsletter to get the latest news, Updates and amazing offers delivered directly in to your inbox.

Categories

  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Columns
  • Bare Acts and Rules
  • Online Internship
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend – हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
      • Uttar Pradesh Acts
      • Uttar Pradesh Rules
      • Uttrakhand
      • DELHI
  • Webinar/Videos
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
  • Android App
  • IOS APP

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In