Professionally Qualified Court Managers Essential for Judicial Efficiency: Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Frame Rules Within 3 Months

In a significant step towards strengthening court administration across the country, the Supreme Court on Thursday directed all High Courts to frame or amend rules for the recruitment and service conditions of Court Managers within three months, taking the Assam Rules of 2018 as a model. The judgment was delivered in the ongoing proceedings in All India Judges Association vs Union of India, Writ Petition (C) No. 1022 of 1989.

The three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice Augustine George Masih, and Justice K. Vinod Chandran also ordered that respective State Governments must approve these rules within an additional three-month period after receiving them.

Background

The issue before the Court arose from several intervention applications and a writ petition highlighting the inconsistent service conditions and contractual employment of Court Managers appointed in various states following the recommendations of the Thirteenth Finance Commission (2010–2015).

Video thumbnail

The concept of appointing professionally qualified Court Managers—generally MBAs—to assist judges in administrative functions was first introduced by the Finance Commission and supported by subsequent communications from the Ministry of Finance. These appointments were meant to improve judicial efficiency and allow judges to focus on core judicial work.

READ ALSO  Mistake by Court Staff is Not Sufficient Ground to Non-suit a Party: Kerala HC

Despite clear directions from the Supreme Court in its earlier judgment dated August 2, 2018, many High Courts had yet to frame or implement rules to regulate the service conditions of Court Managers. This prompted the filing of new intervention applications and a fresh writ petition.

Court’s Observations

The Court emphasized the administrative importance of Court Managers in enhancing court efficiency, reducing case backlogs, and supporting judicial officers. Referring to its 2018 judgment, the bench reaffirmed:

“Professionally qualified court managers, preferably with an MBA degree, must also be appointed to render assistance in performing the court administration… The services of any person already working as a Court Manager in any district should be regularised by the State Government as we are of the considered view that their assistance is needed for a proper administrative set up in a Court.”

READ ALSO  सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने 400 करोड़ रुपये के मत्स्य पालन घोटाले में गुजरात के पूर्व मंत्री के खिलाफ आपराधिक मामला खारिज किया

The Court noted with concern that in several states, these professionals continued to work on ad hoc or contractual terms without formal service rules or promotional avenues. In some instances, the positions had even been discontinued.

Directions Issued

In its detailed judgment, the Court issued the following key directives:

  1. Model Rules Based on Assam: All High Courts must frame or amend service rules for Court Managers using the Assam Rules of 2018 as a model, within three months.
  2. State Approval: State Governments must approve the framed or amended rules within an additional three months.
  3. Class-II Gazetted Rank: Court Managers shall be given at least the status of Class-II Gazetted Officers for determining pay, allowances, and service benefits.
  4. Supervision: Those in High Courts will function under the Registrar General; those in District Courts will report to Registrars or Superintendents.
  5. Non-Overlap of Duties: Duties of Court Managers must not overlap with those of Registrars.
  6. Regularisation Through Suitability Test: Existing Court Managers serving on contract or ad hoc basis shall be continued and regularised subject to passing a suitability test, to be prescribed in the framed rules.
  7. Retrospective Service Benefits: Regularised Court Managers will be entitled to service continuity from the date of initial appointment for terminal benefits, though no salary arrears shall be payable.
  8. Completion Timeline: The process of regularisation must be completed within three months of the State Government’s rule approval.
  9. Responsibility Assigned: Registrar Generals and Chief Secretaries will be personally responsible for compliance with the prescribed timelines.
  10. Promotions and ACP Schemes: High Courts and State Governments must consider providing promotional avenues or Assured Career Progression (ACP) schemes for Court Managers.

READ ALSO  Allahabad HC Imposes Rs 35000 Cost in Habeas Corpus Pleas, Says Its a Ploy to Defame Girl and Her Family Members
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles