Permanent Committee Has No Discretion to Withhold or Defer Advocate’s Designation as Senior Advocate: Orissa HC

In a landmark decision, the Orissa High Court ruled that the Permanent Committee tasked with the designation of Senior Advocates does not have the authority to withhold or defer an advocate’s name from being forwarded to the Full Court for consideration. The judgment was delivered in the case of Banshidhar Baug v. Orissa High Court

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  No Inconsistency Between SARFAESI Act and Gangster Act as Object of both Acts are Different, and Both Operate in Separate Fields: Allahabad HC
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles