In a recent hearing, the Supreme Court of India underscored the principle that “nobody is above the law,” while addressing a matrimonial dispute between a businessman and his estranged wife, an IPS officer. The bench, comprising Justices B R Gavai, Augustine George Masih, and K Vinod Chandran, highlighted the importance of settling disputes amicably and justice for all parties involved.
The court’s observation came after the husband’s counsel expressed concerns that his client might suffer lifelong consequences due to the estranged wife’s influential position in the police. The justices reassured that the judiciary is there to protect against any victimization, urging both parties to seek an amicable resolution instead of prolonged litigation.
“You are a businessman. She is an IPS officer. Rather than wasting your time in court, you should settle it. We are here to protect you if there is any victimisation,” the bench advised during the proceedings.
The conflict escalated when the husband’s counsel alleged that the wife had provided false declarations about her criminal record at the time of her police service induction, claiming that no FIRs were registered against her despite facing charges on the day of her application. The court, however, pointed out that the husband seemed more focused on damaging her career rather than resolving their personal issues.
“You are not interested in saving your life. You are interested in ensuring that her career goes. Ultimately, in the process of ruining her life, you will also ruin your life,” the bench remarked, making it clear that the man was not inclined towards a peaceful settlement.
The Supreme Court could not compel the parties to settle if they were unwilling but suggested they should resolve their disputes without further court intervention. “If you have any apprehensions, we will take care of that in our order,” the bench added, providing a protective assurance.
The hearing concluded with both parties agreeing to attempt finding an amicable solution, as suggested by their respective lawyers. The case has been adjourned for two weeks to give time for these discussions. The hearing also involved a plea by the woman challenging an Allahabad High Court’s June 2022 verdict that discharged the man’s parents from a criminal case she had lodged.
