Madras HC dismisses Writ Petition to Advance Counting of votes in Tamil Nadu

The Madras High Court on Wednesday dismissed a writ petition for quashing the election notification for Tamil Nadu fixing the date of polling as April 19 and the date of counting of votes as June 4.

The writ petition was filed by a person named Ezhilan who wanted the court to issue a directive to the Election Commission of India for advancing the date of counting without the present long gap of 45 days between the date of voting and the date of counting.

However, the first bench of the Madras High Court comprising Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy rejected the plea.

Play button

Ezhilan’s counsel A. Rajini argued that providing such a long gap of 45 days was against the spirit of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 which provides for the conduct of free and fair elections.

READ ALSO  No Person Can Alienate or Create Encumbrance for Land Belonging to an Idol or Deity Without Following the Due Process of Law: Madras HC

She also claimed that it was arbitrary and illegal to delay the counting of votes.

To this the Chief Justice asked whether there was any provision in the said Act that requires the Election Commission of India to count the votes within a specific period.

The counsel for the petitioner stated that there was no such provision in the Act.

After recording her submission, the judges wrote, “We do not find that the present petition espouses any public cause. It is more in the nature of a publicity interest litigation. The date of polling and counting has to be determined by only the Election Commission of India.”

READ ALSO  मद्रास हाईकोर्ट ने यूट्यूबर फेलिक्स गेराल्ड की अग्रिम जमानत याचिका खारिज कर दी

Also Read

The first bench of the Madras High Court also said, “It will not be within the domain of the High Court by exercising its powers under Article 226 (writ jurisdiction) of the Constitution to interfere with the election programme.”

READ ALSO  Article 21 of the Constitution Includes Right to Reputation: Himachal Pradesh HC

The division bench further observed, “Article 329 (bar to interference by courts into electoral matters) of the Constitution also would not permit it to interfere with election programme.” (IANS)

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles