Judgment of a Court is not to be read as the Euclid’s Theorem shorn of the facts and the context in which the law has been declared: Supreme Court

Recently, The Supreme Court stated that, a judgment of a Court is not to be read as the Euclid’s Theorem shorn of the facts and the context in which the law has been declared. The bench of Justices K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy was dealing with the application filed in Contempt Petition.  In this case,

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  How to Identify Lawyers, who really need help during Pandemic? Supreme Court to Examine
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Related Articles

Latest Articles