The Supreme Court of India, comprising a bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Augustine George Masih, held that High Courts exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, cannot re-appreciate evidence to overturn concurrent findings of fact recorded by lower courts. Setting aside a Punjab and Haryana High Court
High Court Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence In Revisional Jurisdiction To Overturn Concurrent Findings On Landlord’s Bona Fide Need: Supreme Court
