Reiterating that extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India should not be exercised when a special enactment provides an efficacious statutory mechanism for redressal of grievances, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, presided over by Justice Bibhu Datta Guru, has dismissed a writ petition seeking to substitute immovable properties attached under the
When Special Enactment Provides Efficacious Statutory Remedy, High Court Should Not Exercise Extraordinary Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Chhattisgarh High Court
