Haryana Assembly Election Results Under Scrutiny in Supreme Court Over Alleged EVM Discrepancies

The legitimacy of the recent Haryana Assembly election results is being challenged in the Supreme Court, following a petition that raises serious concerns about the reliability of electronic voting machines (EVMs) used during the polling. The petitioners, Priya Mishra and Vikas Bansal, represented by advocate Narendra Mishra, have called for a re-election in 20 constituencies, citing notable discrepancies in EVM battery capacities that they argue could have influenced the election outcomes.

According to the petition, during the counting process, variations were observed in the battery capacities of EVMs; some machines operated at 99% capacity, while others were below 80%, with a few even as low as 60-70%. This inconsistency was notably present within the same polling stations, leading to doubts over the fairness and transparency of the electoral process.

READ ALSO  Nations grappling with use of black money in polls, electoral bonds scheme aimed at eradicating it: Centre to SC

The issue was first brought to light through a complaint by the Indian National Congress to the Election Commission of India (ECI), which alleged neglect and inaction by Returning Officers despite the reported irregularities. The petition underscores the unusual fluctuations in voter turnout data, which escalated from 61.19% on October 5, 2024, to 67.90% just two days later, raising further suspicions about the electoral integrity.

Play button

The petitioners are demanding that the ECI conduct a thorough investigation into the matter, particularly focusing on how EVMs were charged and the possibility of them being powered by an unauthorized external energy source. They have urged the Supreme Court to mandate a re-election in the affected constituencies and to require the ECI to release all voter turnout data along with Form 17C, which records detailed voting data.

READ ALSO  Teachers of unaided private schools entitled to same pay as govt school counterparts: Delhi HC

By invoking Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioners seek to uphold fundamental rights and ensure that the democratic process is not compromised by potential electoral malpractices. The plea emphasizes the need for transparency and adherence to the People Representation Act, 1951, and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, to maintain public trust in the electoral system.

Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner
READ ALSO  कर्नाटक हाईकोर्ट के न्यायाधीश द्वारा महिला वकील के प्रति विवादास्पद टिप्पणी पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने प्रतिक्रिया दी

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles