Will Clarification of a Government order operate Retrospectively or Prospectively? Allahabad HC Judgment

The Allahabad High Court at Lucknow has held that a clarification issued with respect to an earlier Government Order or Statute, shall operate retrospectively.


An advertisement was issued on 05.10.2016 by U.P. Subordinate Service Selection Commission inviting online applications for various posts including the post of Cane Supervisor. The essential qualification for the post of Cane Supervisor is graduation in Agricultural Science or any equivalent qualification along with ‘CCC’ Certificate issued by DOEACC Society.

Petitioners approached the Allahabad High Court at Lucknow challenging the order dated 15.01.2020 by which the Commissioner, Sugarcane and Sugar, Lucknow clarified that the candidates who possess equivalent qualification to ‘CCC’ Certificate issued by DOEACC Society are not entitled to participate in the interview held for the post of Cane Supervisor.

Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the State Government has clarified that the persons who possess Diploma in Computer, Degree in Computer, PGDCA, BCA, MCA and Graduation with B.A., B.Sc, B.Tech. , M.Sc., M.B.A., wherein Computer is one of the subjects or where computer is a course in one semester of the courses shall be deemed to be equivalent qualification to ‘CCC’ Certificate and shall be eligible for selection on the post of Junior Assistant, Stenographer and all other posts of public service of State Government.

It was further submitted that He has further contended that the candidate with higher qualification is deemed to fulfill the lower qualification prescribed for a post provided that such higher qualification must be in the same channel with the lower qualification.

He also submitted before the Court that since the Government Orders issued by the State are in the nature of clarification and, therefore, a clarificatory/ explanatory amendments will have retrospective effect.


Whether the petitioners are entitled for the retrospective benefit of equivalence of ‘CCC’ Certificate as provided in the Government Order dated 05.07.2018 issued for all the public services/ posts of the State Government read with Government Orders dated 3/6.05.2016 and 23.09.2016 issued for the posts of Junior Assistant and Stenographer?


Hon’ble Justice C.D. Singh of Allahabad High Court at Lucknow referred to the Judgments of Supreme Court in the case of S.B. Bhattacharjee vs S.D. Majumdar and others; (2007) 10 SCC 513, Ashok Lanka vs Rishi Dikshit and others; (2006) 9 SCC 90, Union of India and others vs Martin Lottery Agencies Limited; (2009) 12 SCC 209, wherein the Supreme Court has held that the clarificatory or explanatory order have retrospective effect.

The Court observed:

If a new Government Order/ Office Order/ Memorandum/ Act/ Rule is ‘to explain’ an earlier Government Order/ Office Order/ Memorandum/ Act/ Rule, it would be without object unless construed retrospective. An explanatory/ clarificatory Government Order is generally passed to supply an obvious omission or to clear up doubts as to the meaning of the previous Government Order. It is well settled that if a statute is curative or merely declaratory of the previous law retrospective operation is generally intended. The language ‘shall be deemed always to have meant’ is declaratory, and is in plain terms retrospective. In the absence of clear words indicating that the amending Government Order is declaratory, it would not be so construed when the pre-amended provision was clear and unambiguous. An amending Government Order may be purely clarificatory to clear a meaning of a provision of the principal Government Order which was already implicit. A clarificatory amendment of this nature will have retrospective effect.

Considering above the Court allowed the Writ Petition and quashed the order dated 15.01.2020 passed by the Commissioner, Sugarcane and Sugar, U.P., Lucknow. The Court further directed to allow the petitioners to participate in the interview to be held in pursuance of the Advertisement No.20-Examination/2016 and consider the candidature of the petitioners on merit in accordance with law.

Click to Read/Download Judgment

Download Law Trend App

Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles