• About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Law Trend
  • google-play
  • apple-store
  • Login
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend - हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
  • Webinar
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
No Result
View All Result
Law Trend
No Result
View All Result

Disputes Related to Election of Cooperative Societies Cannot Be Decided In Writ Jurisdiction: Allahabad HC

by Law Trend
January 3, 2021
in Judgements, Trending Stories
2 min read
allahabad hc cooperative society
617
SHARES
1.8k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via WhatsappShare via EmailPinterest

Recently, a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court comprising Hon’ble justice Surya Prakash Keserwani and Hon’ble Justice Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava has held that dispute relating to the election of a cooperative society cannot be called into question under writ jurisdiction of High Court in light of UP Cooperative Societies Rule, 1968 and UP Cooperative Societies Act.

In the instant petition, the petitioner had sought a direction to decide his claim(petitioners’) concerning election proceedings of Matsya Jivi Sahkari Ltd.( a cooperative society).

Learned Counsel for the State submitted that as per Section 70 of Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act and under Rule 444-C (2) of the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules, once the election of a cooperative society has concluded, the aggrieved party can take the case to the Registrar.

The Bench observed that manner of settlement of disputes is provided under Chapter IX of Act of 1965.

Hon’ble Court observed that disputes covered under Section 70 could be referred to arbitration. In contrast, disputes specified under sub-section (1) should be referred to the Registrar while the Courts will not have the jurisdiction to entertain such suits.

The Bench clarified that under Sub-rule (1) of Rule 444-C election of a cooperative society cannot be called into question except under clause a and b of ‘sub-rule 1.

In this particular case, the cooperative society’s elections were already held, and the results were displayed.

Hon’ble Allahabad High Court held that disputes or complaints related to a cooperative society’s election proceedings could be called into question only on grounds specified under sub-rule (1) of Rule 444-C after making an application under Section 70 of the Act.

The Court further held that since the whole mechanism for settling the disputes is already provided, there was no need for the Court to use their jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed.

Case Details:-

Title: Matsya Jivi Sahkari vs State of U.P

Date of Order:16/12/2020

Coram: Hon’ble justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Hon’ble Justice Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava

Read Judgment
Tags: Allahabad High Courtcooperative societyelection

Related Posts

Supreme Court New 5
Court Updates

Supreme Court Slaps Cost of 25K for “Gross Abuse of Law”

January 25, 2021
ncpcr
Court Updates

NCPCR requests Maharashtra Government to file Urgent Appeal against Bombay HC’s “Skin to Skin” Judgement

January 25, 2021
right to marry and religion conversion
Court Updates

Supreme Court Rejects UP Govt Plea to Transfer All Pleas Challenging New Anti Conversion Law

January 25, 2021

POPULAR NEWS

  • advocate sticker fortuner

    Where is the Provision of Using Advocate Sticker on Vehicle?

    5026 shares
    Share 2010 Tweet 1257
  • What is the tenure of protection granted under Anticipatory Bail? :SC 5 Judges

    4807 shares
    Share 1922 Tweet 1201
  • Air Asia Crashes Against Gaurav Taneja; Court Says Airline Suppressed Facts

    4645 shares
    Share 1858 Tweet 1161
  • Husband-Wife Take Oath as High Court Judge

    3247 shares
    Share 1299 Tweet 812
  • Is Using Stickers of ‘‘Advocate’’ on Vehicle legally Allowed?

    3185 shares
    Share 1274 Tweet 796
Law Trend

Rabhyaa Foundation has started this platform on values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. The object of this platform is to create informed citizens with recent legal updates, Judgments, Legislations of Parliament and State Legislatures, and views of experts in the field of law, in plain and pointed language, for the intellectual development of citizens.
Our tag line “The Line of Law” guides that this......
Read More

Follow Us On Social Media

Subscribe to our News Letter

Sign Up for weekly newsletter to get the latest news, Updates and amazing offers delivered directly in to your inbox.

Categories

  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Columns
  • Bare Acts and Rules
  • Online Internship
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Trending Stories
  • Court Updates
  • Judgements
  • Law Trend – हिन्दी
  • Bare Acts and Rules
    • Central
    • State
      • Uttar Pradesh Acts
      • Uttar Pradesh Rules
      • Uttrakhand
      • DELHI
  • Webinar/Videos
  • Columns
  • Online Internship
  • More
    • Humour
    • Submit Judgment/Order/Posts
    • Quotes
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Courts Weblink
  • Android App
  • IOS APP

© 2020 Law Trends| All Right Reserved | Designed ByAaratechnologies Pvt Ltd

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In