Delhi HC Transfers Judge After SHO Alleges Coercion for Personal Favours and Funds

The Delhi High Court has taken administrative action against a sitting judge of the Saket Court, transferring him from his current position following serious allegations leveled by a Station House Officer (SHO) of the Delhi Police. The SHO accused the judge of persistent misbehavior, harassment, and compelling police personnel to perform personal tasks, including paying for personal items like a cricket kit and a gym membership.

Case Background

The matter came to light after SHO Pankaj Kumar, in-charge of the Hazrat Nizamuddin Police Station, made formal allegations against Mr. X Judge, who was then serving as a judge in the Saket Court. The jurisdiction of the Hazrat Nizamuddin Police Station fell under Judge X court, meaning all cases registered at the station were presented before him. SHO Kumar alleged that this jurisdictional power was being misused by the judge to harass him and his staff for approximately a year.

Video thumbnail

Allegations by the Complainant

In a detailed account, reportedly recorded in a daily diary, SHO Pankaj Kumar laid out a series of grave accusations against Judge X. The primary allegations include:

  • Coercion for Personal Services: The SHO claimed that Judge forced him and other police officers to carry out personal work for him. It was alleged that police personnel from the Hazrat Nizamuddin station were made to travel to Rajasthan to work at the judge’s wedding in December of the previous year.
  • Demand for Money: The SHO further alleged that the judge compelled him to bear personal expenses. Specifically, it was claimed that Judge Taparia made the SHO pay for a cricket kit and for his gym membership fees.
  • Misconduct and Harassment: SHO Kumar stated that the judge frequently misbehaved with him in court. He contended that the judge was harassing police officials in certain cases, leveraging his judicial authority over the police station.
READ ALSO  Government Fails to satisfy Allahabad High Court, as to the steps taken for enforcement of social distancing and the wearing of masks.Courts grants a days time to file another Affidavit

Action by the Delhi High Court

Following the emergence of these allegations, the Delhi High Court initiated action against Judge. Taking cognizance of the serious nature of the claims made by the police officer, the High Court issued an order on July 15, transferring Judge from his post at the Saket Court.

The administrative order by the Delhi High Court effectively removes the judge from his current judicial duties at the Saket Court pending further proceedings or posting. Judge, a resident of Jangpura Extension, will no longer preside over the court that handles cases from the Hazrat Nizamuddin Police Station.

READ ALSO  Jabalpur Man Files Contempt Against CJI SA Bobde
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles