Supreme Court Grants Delhi Golf Club Temporary Reprieve Over Monument Sealing; Slams ASI’s ‘Callous’ Approach

In a dramatic turn of events, the Supreme Court of India has granted what it termed an “extraordinary indulgence” to the prestigious Delhi Golf Club. The top court has temporarily stayed its previous order, which directed authorities to seal structures and halt activities within the prohibited zones of ancient protected monuments located inside the club’s grounds.

The freeze on the sealing directive will remain in place until the next scheduled hearing on July 22, 2026, offering a brief window of relief for the elite golf club.

The decision was handed down by a division bench comprising Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and N Kotiswar Singh. The pause comes after senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the Delhi Golf Club, urgently requested additional time to formally respond to the court’s initial orders and formulate actionable conservation suggestions.

“Though the court does not find any ground for any rethinking, however, by way of extraordinary indulgence, the implementation of the aforesaid directions to the chairperson, NDMC, and Commissioner of Police, Delhi, is kept in abeyance till the next date of listing on July 22, 2026,” the bench noted.

A Sudden Halt to Sweeping Sealing Orders

The temporary reprieve stalls a highly disruptive set of directives issued during a Wednesday hearing.

READ ALSO  SC issues notice in Delhi Police Appeal Against Bail Granted to Accused in Delhi riot case

Initially, the apex court had ordered an immediate halt to all activities within a strict 100-metre radius of Lal Bangla I & II—two critical, protected monuments situated near the main entrance gate of the Delhi Golf Club. Under the original order, both the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) and the Delhi Police were expected to swiftly step in to seal any structures violating this boundary.

Additionally, the bench had imposed a 20-metre no-activity buffer zone around nine other historical structures located within the club’s expansive premises. Just like the 100-metre ban surrounding Lal Bangla, this wider 20-metre restriction has also been put on hold until late July.

Monument Neglect Sparks Judicial Anger

The aggressive legal action stems from the court’s deep concern over the rapidly deteriorating state of Delhi’s rich architectural history. The bench described the current situation as “alarming,” observing that a vast majority of the city’s ancient monuments show no signs of active conservation and are crumbling into dilapidated states.

The issue initially came to the court’s attention via a petition filed by Rajeev Suri. Suri’s original case highlighted severe encroachment surrounding the Gumti of Shaikh Ali, a prominent Lodhi-era monument situated in Delhi’s Defence Colony.

As the legal proceedings expanded, a comprehensive survey report compiled by court commissioners—led by senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan—uncovered the precarious state of the ten ancient structures sitting directly inside the Delhi Golf Club.

ASI Chief Summoned Over Heritage Decay

While the Delhi Golf Club secured a temporary breathing room, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) found itself in the direct line of judicial fire.

READ ALSO  Delhi HC Denies Further Bail Extension to Kuldeep Sengar in Unnao Rape Case, Orders Surrender

The Supreme Court expressed sharp frustration over the state agency’s apparent failure to enforce protective laws and maintain monuments legally placed under its care. The bench issued an official notice to the Director of the ASI, demanding they explain why punitive orders should not be initiated against them.

“Coming to the role of the ASI in not taking appropriate steps as per the requirements of the Act, by ensuring that no activity happens around the monument which is protected and has to be taken care of, we issue notice to the Director, ASI, as to why appropriate orders be not passed against him for such callous and casual approach,” the bench declared.

READ ALSO  Delhi Court Denies Custody Parole to J&K MP Engineer Rashid for Parliament Session

The court pointed out that despite the monument being under the direct custody of the ASI, “there is absolutely no work undertaken or action taken by it.”

The Director of the ASI has been ordered to file a personally affirmed explanation addressing these failures before the Supreme Court reconvenes on July 22.

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles