In a stern observation that raises serious questions about the integrity of India’s legal profession, the Supreme Court on Friday expressed deep concern over the proliferation of individuals practicing law with fraudulent qualifications.
The bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, highlighted the gravity of the situation, noting that there are “thousands of fraudulent people wearing black robes with serious doubts about their degrees.” The top court went as far as suggesting that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) “needs to do something” to investigate the issue.
These significant remarks came during the hearing of a contempt petition regarding the Delhi High Court’s alleged delay in implementing guidelines for designating Senior Advocates.
While addressing the primary petition, the Supreme Court ultimately refused to entertain the plea. The bench heavily criticized the petitioner, advocate Sanjay Dubey, for his conduct and the language he had used on social media platforms like Facebook.
“Let people understand the kind of language you’re using on Facebook. I will show you what is the meaning of discipline in the profession,” Chief Justice Surya Kant reprimanded the advocate.
Justice Bagchi further questioned the true purpose of the ‘Senior Advocate’ designation, asking, “Is a senior advocate tag a status symbol which is ornamental to be kept or for your participation in the justice system?”
Following the bench’s sharp rebuke regarding both his social media conduct and the merits of the case, the petitioner opted to withdraw the contempt plea.
