The Supreme Court has held that under Section 34(4) of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, judgments delivered by the Patna High Court prior to the creation of the State of Jharkhand are binding on the successor State. The Court ruled that the State cannot plead its own inefficiency to deny legitimate rights to employees and
Patna High Court Pre-Reorganization Orders Binding on Jharkhand; State Cannot Deny Pay Parity citing Delay: Supreme Court
