Allahabad High Court Acquits 68-Year-Old Man After 38 Years, Says Prosecution Failed to Prove Murder Charge

The Allahabad High Court has set aside the conviction of a 68-year-old man who had been serving a life sentence in a 1985 Bulandshahr murder case, observing that his alleged involvement appeared “highly doubtful” and that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

A division bench of Justices J.J. Munir and Sanjiv Kumar allowed the criminal appeal filed by Onkar, overturning the judgment dated December 2, 1987, passed by the Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr, which had sentenced him to imprisonment for life under sections 302 (murder) and 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code.

READ ALSO  Man in jail since 2016 in theft case gets 6-yr imprisonment

The FIR was lodged on February 11, 1985, by complainant Ram Ji Lal at Ahmad Garh police station, alleging that three individuals — Virendra, Onkar and Ajab Singh — forcefully entered his house and killed his nephew Rajendra.

During the pendency of the appeal, co-accused Virendra and Ajab Singh passed away, resulting in the appeal against them abating. The matter proceeded only with respect to the surviving appellant, Onkar.

In its judgment delivered on December 1, the High Court held that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove that Onkar participated in the killing or that he entered the informant’s house along with the other accused.

“The involvement of appellant/convict in the offence appears to be highly doubtful. The prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and it has not been established that the appellant Onkar along with others entered into the informant’s house and committed the murder of Rajendra,” the bench observed, adding that the trial court did not appreciate the evidence correctly and “illegally convicted and sentenced the appellant.”

READ ALSO  पासपोर्ट सत्यापन रिपोर्ट चार सप्ताह में पूरी की जाए: इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट का निर्देश

Acquitting the appellant, the court noted that Onkar was already on bail and ordered that he would not be required to surrender. “His bail bond is cancelled and the sureties discharged,” the bench directed.

The decision brings closure to a 38-year-old criminal proceeding, with the High Court concluding that the conviction could not be sustained in the absence of reliable and consistent evidence.

READ ALSO  SC Refuses to Stay Conviction of SP Leader Abdullah Azam Khan in Criminal Case, Seeks UP Govt’s Reply
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles