SC Declines to Stay Land-for-Jobs Trial Against Lalu Prasad Yadav, Directs Him to Pursue Quashing Plea in Delhi High Court

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to grant relief to Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad Yadav in the CBIโ€™s land-for-jobs case, turning down his plea to stay trial court proceedings linked to appointments during his tenure as Railway Minister between 2004 and 2009.

A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh told Yadav to pursue his main petition before the Delhi High Court, where he has sought to quash the CBI chargesheets.

โ€œWe will not stay. We will dismiss the appeal and we will say that let the main matter be decided. Why should we keep this small matter?โ€ the bench remarked, as reported by LiveLaw.

READ ALSO  เคธเฅเคชเฅเคฐเฅ€เคฎ เค•เฅ‹เคฐเฅเคŸ เคจเฅ‡ เค…เคจเฅเคธเฅ‚เคšเคฟเคค เคœเคพเคคเคฟ, เค…เคจเฅเคธเฅ‚เคšเคฟเคค เคœเคจเคœเคพเคคเคฟ เค†เคฐเค•เฅเคทเคฃ เคธเฅ‡ 'เค•เฅเคฐเฅ€เคฎเฅ€ เคฒเฅ‡เคฏเคฐ' เค•เฅ‹ เคฌเคพเคนเคฐ เคฐเค–เคจเฅ‡ เค•เคพ เค†เคฆเฅ‡เคถ เคฆเคฟเคฏเคพ

While declining the stay, the Supreme Court said that Lalu Prasad could be exempted from personal appearance before the trial court in light of the circumstances. It clarified that the Delhi High Court would decide on his plea to quash the CBI chargesheets.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered the case in May 2022, alleging that several Group D appointments in the West Central Railway were given in return for land parcels transferred to Yadavโ€™s family members or close associates.

READ ALSO  เคธเฅเคชเฅเคฐเฅ€เคฎ เค•เฅ‹เคฐเฅเคŸ เคจเฅ‡ เคœเคฎเฅเคฎเฅ‚ เคฎเฅ‡เค‚ เคจเค เคนเคพเคˆ เค•เฅ‹เคฐเฅเคŸ เคชเคฐเคฟเคธเคฐ เค•เฅ‡ เคจเคฟเคฐเฅเคฎเคพเคฃ เค•เฅ€ เคชเฅเคฐเค—เคคเคฟ เคชเคฐ เคตเคฟเคตเคฐเคฃ เคฎเคพเค‚เค—เคพ

Yadav, a former Bihar chief minister, has called the charges politically motivated. His legal team has argued that the probe was initiated without the mandatory sanction required under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. They have also claimed that the investigation amounts to an abuse of legal process and reflects what they called a โ€œjurisdictional errorโ€ driven by political vendetta.

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles