The Supreme Court on Thursday raised serious concerns over the Karnataka High Court’s decision to grant bail to Kannada film star Darshan in the high-profile Renukaswamy murder case, stating that it was “not at all convinced” by the manner in which judicial discretion was exercised.
A bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan made the sharp observation while hearing a plea filed by the Karnataka government challenging the High Court’s December 13, 2024 bail order, which extended relief to Darshan and several co-accused, including actress Pavithra Gowda.
“To be very honest with you, we are not convinced with the manner in which the High Court has exercised discretion. Very honestly, we will say this,” the bench remarked, addressing senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who appeared on behalf of Darshan.
The bench added, “We will hear you because your clients are on bail. But you must have seen the manner in which the High Court dictated the order.”
Darshan and others stand accused of the abduction and brutal murder of 33-year-old Renukaswamy, a fan who had allegedly sent obscene messages to actress Pavithra Gowda. According to police, the victim was held captive in a shed in Bengaluru for three days in June 2024, during which he was subjected to severe torture. His body was later discovered in a drain, prompting a high-level investigation.
The murder, which stunned the Kannada film industry and the public alike, has sparked widespread calls for accountability and transparency in the judicial process. The Supreme Court’s pointed remarks indicate heightened scrutiny of the bail proceedings and suggest that the case may take a significant turn.
Further hearings in the matter are expected in the coming weeks.
