In a strong message to public officials defying judicial orders, the Madras High Court has sentenced senior IAS officer Anshul Mishra to one month of simple imprisonment for contempt of court. Justice P Velmurugan, delivering the order, also directed Mishra to pay ₹25,000 in compensation from his salary to the two petitioners in the case. However, the sentence has been suspended for 30 days to allow the officer time to file an appeal.
Anshul Mishra, currently serving as Managing Director of the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, was previously the Member Secretary of the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA). The court found him guilty of wilfully disobeying its November 2023 order in a land acquisition case.
The petitioners, R Lalithambai and K S Viswanathan—siblings—had approached the court regarding 17 cents of land acquired from them in 1983 by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. Although tenements were built on the land, the petitioners claimed it was never utilized. The High Court had directed the CMDA to consider their plea for the return of the property and pass appropriate orders within two months. After no action was taken, the petitioners filed a contempt petition in August 2024.
In scathing remarks, the court highlighted a pattern of disregard for judicial directions by public authorities. “In numerous cases, it is seen that poor and aggrieved litigants, after approaching public authorities for redressal of genuine grievances, are forced to approach the constitutional courts for directions,” Justice Velmurugan said. “Even after judicial intervention, the concerned authorities, for reasons best known to them, either delay or altogether ignore compliance, compelling the litigants to resort to contempt proceedings for enforcement of their rights.”
The judge observed that non-compliance with court orders by officers was not an isolated instance and undermines public trust in the judiciary. “The confidence of the citizens in the justice delivery system rests upon the assurance that the orders of the courts will be implemented promptly and effectively,” the court stated, adding, “Public service is not a privilege but a trust reposed in the officials by the people.”
