The Supreme Court has intervened to ensure government-supported medical care for Harish Rana, a 30-year-old man who has been in a permanent vegetative state for over 11 years following a tragic accident. This decision came after his parents, burdened by the financial and emotional toll of his long-term care, sought the Court’s approval for passive euthanasia, which was denied by the Delhi High Court.
Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, on his last working day, reviewed a report from the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and approved a comprehensive plan to provide medical and other necessary care for Rana, who has been bed-ridden and dependent on a food pipe for sustenance. The Court clarified that Rana was not on mechanical life support, which would make the case one of passive euthanasia, but required continuous medical care.
The apex court explored alternatives to euthanasia, focusing on enhancing Rana’s quality of life through state-supported measures. The Ministry of Health proposed several care options, which include regular home visits by a physiotherapist and dietician, on-call medical support, nursing care, and free provision of all required medicines and consumables. If home care proves infeasible, the plan also provides for Rana’s transfer to the District Hospital in Noida, with potential support from NGOs.
Justice Chandrachud emphasized the responsibility of the judiciary and government in ensuring Rana’s right to adequate medical care, stating, “If he requires urgent medical intervention and we do not acknowledge it, we will also bear responsibility.” This sentiment reflects the Court’s proactive approach in safeguarding the dignity and welfare of individuals in critical health conditions.
The Court’s order also grants liberty to Rana’s parents to seek further directions if necessary, acknowledging the ongoing challenges they may face in managing his care. This decision underscores the judiciary’s compassionate consideration of the profound difficulties faced by families in similar situations.
Previously, Rana’s parents had endured significant hardship, having sold their home to finance his treatment following his accident in 2013, which resulted in diffuse axonal injury from a fall from the fourth floor of his accommodation. Despite various medical consultations, doctors have declared no hope for recovery, leading his family to lose hope and seek the court’s intervention for passive euthanasia—a plea that was initially rejected by the Delhi High Court due to legal constraints and Rana’s non-terminal condition.
