On Monday, the Supreme Court expressed serious concerns over the failure of the Punjab and Haryana state governments to effectively address the issue of stubble burning, particularly noting an increase in incidents during the Diwali period. Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih of the bench highlighted the government’s reluctance to penalize both farmers and officers responsible for enforcing the rules against this practice.
During the proceedings, the court was perplexed by the rise in stubble burning cases around Diwali, questioning the lack of action taken against responsible officers and the leniency shown towards farmers. “How can this happen? How come this increased in Diwali? Why are you sparing your officers?” Justice Oka asked, pointing out the government’s apparent reluctance to enforce compliance with environmental laws.
The court underscored the need for stringent enforcement of the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) Act, 2021, criticizing the state governments for merely issuing show cause notices instead of prosecuting offenders. “Even today we find reluctance on the part of governments in taking action under Section 14 of the CAQM Act, 2021,” the bench noted, demanding an explanation for the absence of prosecutions.
The hearing was part of an ongoing review of measures to combat pollution in the National Capital Region, with a particular focus on stubble burning practices in Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh. In an earlier session in October, the Supreme Court had criticized the central government for not implementing stricter penalties for stubble burning. Since then, penalties have been increased, yet the court remains dissatisfied with the implementation.
In a defense, Punjab’s counsel mentioned that over a thousand officials had been issued show cause notices, advocating for due process. However, the court was quick to counter, emphasizing the need for accountability. “How can the past be forgotten? Look at the past first. Only 56 officials have been prosecuted. What about the rest?” Justice Oka remarked, demonstrating the court’s stance on the need for historical accountability.
Additionally, the court responded to the Punjab government’s request for additional funds to provide farmers with equipment to manage stubble, which the Centre had declined. The court asked the Advocate General for Punjab to respond to this issue, indicating that further justification is needed.
