The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking an exemption for lawyers from wearing black coats and gowns in courts during the summer months. The bench, led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, emphasized that a dress code is necessary to maintain decorum in the court.
“Ultimately, it is a matter of decorum. You should be properly attired. You have to wear something. You cannot argue in ‘kurta-pajama’ or shorts and T-shirt also,” the bench remarked.
The PIL was filed by lawyer Shailendra Mani Tripathi in his personal capacity, seeking relaxation from the mandatory black coat and gown attire during the summer. The court, however, permitted Tripathi to submit a representation to the Bar Council of India, state bar councils, and the Centre, allowing them to make a decision on the matter.
During the hearing, Tripathi argued that lawyers should be exempted from wearing coats and gowns in summer due to varying climatic conditions across India. Chief Justice Chandrachud responded that the climate in Rajasthan differs significantly from Bangalore, and hence, such decisions should be left to the respective bar councils.
The bench reiterated that Tripathi could make a formal representation to the relevant authorities for suitable amendments to the dress code. As the court was not inclined to entertain the PIL, Tripathi sought permission to withdraw it, which was granted.
